Summary Judgment Motions - To File or Not to File? The Honorable Danielle J. Hunsaker, Washington County Circuit Court, Jason Kafoury, Kafoury & McDougal, and Joel Mullin, Stoel Rives, LLP (April 2019)
Judicial Challenges The Honorable Janet Stauffer, 7th Judicial Circuit (August/September 2017)
Use of Fictitious Names for Parties in Civil Litigation in Oregon The Honorable James Hargreaves (Senior Judge, retired), Lane County Circuit Court (June/July 2017)
The Judge's Pledge The Honorable Susan Tripp, Marion County Circuit Court (May/June 2017)
Organizing for the Courtroom The Honorable Daniel R. Murphy, Linn County Circuit Court (March/April 2017)
A Two Year Journey with Odyssey in Juvenile Court The Honorable Lindsay Partridge, Marion County Circuit Court (January/February 2017)
Lane County Streamlined Jury Trial Project The Honorable Curtis Conover, Lane County Circuit Court (November/December 2016)
20 Ways to Further Justice The Honorable Ilisa Rooke-Ley, Lane County Circuit Court (October/November 2016)
Managing Multi-Party/Complex Litigation without Driving Your Judge Crazy (and maybe even making it easier for everyone) The Honorable Henry Kantor, Multnomah County Circuit Court (September 2016)
Managing Multi-Party/Complex Litigation without Driving the Judge's Staff Crazy The Honorable Eve L. Miller, Clackamas County Circuit Court (August 2016)
Do's and Don'ts in the Courtroom The Honorable Lisa Greif, Jackson County Circuit Court (June/July 2016)
Preparation for a Status, Case Management, or Pretrial conference - or how to get more out of a non-evidentiary proceeding in criminal and family court cases The Honorable Kirsten E. Thompson, Washington County Circuit Court (April/May 2016)
Postponements The Honorable Richard Barron, Presiding Judge, Coos/Curry County Circuit Court (March 2016)
Consider Trying More Cases The Honorable Suzanne Chanti, Lane County Circuit Court Judge (February 2016)
Professionalism - It Counts Both In and Out of the Courtroom The Honorable Brian Dretke, Union County Circuit Court Judge (January 2016)
Changes to Sex Changes The Honorable Beth A. Allen, Multnomah County Circuit Court Judge (December 2015)
Top 25 Tips from a Senior Judge The Honorable Michael C. Sullivan, Senior Judge (retired), Deschutes County (November 2015)
How to Succeed at Power Point In the Courtroom The Honorable Michael McShane, US District Court (October 2015)
Effective Use of Evidence At Jury Trial The Honorable Matthew Donohue, Benton County Circuit Court (September 2015)
Making a Record for Appeal, The Honorable Charles M. Zennaché, Lane County Circuit Court (August 2015)
Access to Civil Justice in Oregon's State Courts, The Honorable David Brewer, Associate Justice, Oregon Supreme Court (July 2016)
What Jurors Want: A Look Into the Minds of Jurors, The Honorable John V. Acosta, United States Magistrate Judge (June 2015)
Handling the "Half-se" Hearing, The Honorable Mustafa Kasubhai, Lane County Circuit Court (May 2015)
Effective Voir Dire, Judge Thomas Hart, Marion County Circuit Court (April 2015)
The New Judge on the Block, Judge Lung S. Hung, Malheur County Circuit Court (March 2015)
The Gift of Finality: One PJ's Perspective, Judge Karsten H. Rasmussen, Lane County Circuit Court (February 2015)
ORCP 68 Attorney Fees - when, why and how to seek them, Judge Deanne L. Darling, Clackamas Juvenile Court (January 2015)
Difficult questions must be answered before they are asked, Judge Edward J. Jones, Multnomah County Circuit Court (December 2014)
Judicially Hosted Settlement Conferences, Judge Jamese L. Rhoades and Sr. Judge Don Dickey, Marion County Circuit Court (November 2014)
Working together to make discovery more efficient, The Honorable Youlee Yim You, Multnomah County Circuit Court (October 2014)
Court Trials - A Jury of One, The Honorable Katherine E. Tennyson, Multnomah County Circuit Court (September 2014)
Making the Most of Short Evidentiary Hearings, The Honorable Daniel R. Murphy, Linn County Circuit Court (August 2014)
Vouching, The Honorable Jay McAlpin, Lane County Circuit Court (July 2014)
Appropriate Jury Instructions Can Help Litigators Win Trials, The Honorable Paula Brownhill, Clatsop County Circuit Court (June 2014)
Evidentiary Hearings and Motion Practice in the era of Oregon e-court, The Honorable Benjamin Bloom, Jackson County Circuit Court (May 2014)
Motions in Limine - Tips for "Newer" Litigators, The Honorable Jodie Mooney, Lane County Circuit Court (April 2014)
The Honorable Daniel R. Murphy
Linn County Circuit Court
Organizing for the Courtroom
It cannot be emphasized enough that the better organized attorney in the courtroom will nearly always do better than the disorganized attorney. Judges and juries cannot help but notice how well counsel is organized. Attorneys who are naturally predisposed toward being organized have an advantage here but anyone can learn to organize themselves and exercise some self-discipline when preparing for trial.
Nothing impresses less than a manila file folder stuffed full of disorganized documents and an attorney wasting everyone's time sifting through such a file and mumbling about how "it was just here". I have seen this many times and the effect is the same each time.
File folders are not for trial! They are for storage of documents. To be organized at trial the practitioner needs to create a trial notebook with sections devoted to the various phases of the trial. This way notes, exhibits and other documents are at your fingertips when needed. The trial notebook can be paper-based or on a computer. I suggest the paper based version continues to be best because you need paper documents to offer into evidence.
How you organize your trial notebook is a personal preference but at the very least each one should include tabbed and labeled sections on:
- Jury Instructions in writing
- Voir Dire in Jury Trials
- Legal Memoranda - read and follow UTCR 6.050 regarding trial memos.
- Opening Statement
- Notes for examining your witnesses including, as needed, past recollection recorded; photographs, etc.
- Notes for cross examining their witnesses including impeachment documents.
- Exhibits including the original to offer to the court clerk, a copy for the witness, a copy for you, a copy for counsel and a copy for the judge. Exhibits should all be properly marked.
- Notes on any anticipated motions during trial or difficult evidentiary issues.
- Closing Argument
- Any motions or memoranda you intend to file at end of case.
A trial attorney who handles exhibits with confidence and expertise will dominate a courtroom and inspire confidence. An attorney who fumbles with exhibits, has to mark them as they offer them, cannot keep track of what number they are on, and otherwise appears disorganized will not impress anyone.
All possible exhibits should be pre-marked with evidence labels and numbered pursuant to UTCR 6.080. If the number of exhibits is large or there are multiple parties counsel needs to confer with the other parties to coordinate the numbering. This should not be left to the morning of trial.
If counsel is rusty on laying foundations it would be wise to put a cheat sheet in the trial notebook for how to lay the foundation for exhibits, especially certain records and photographs.
It is very important that counsel prepare for witnesses and prepare witnesses in advance of trial.
Counsel should talk to all witnesses prior to trial and make sure counsel understands what the witness knows from personal knowledge (unless there is a clear exception to the hearsay rule that applies). Counsel should never rely on what their client tells them a witness knows or can testify to.
To avoid cumulative and redundant testimony counsel needs to know in advance and prepare for what the witness can testify to.
Witnesses should also be told about courtroom procedure. They need to know what to expect, where to go, how the swearing in process works, etc. They should be told when to report to the courthouse, where to go in the courthouse and the importance of remaining available until excused.
Counsel must have a reasonably accurate estimate for how long their portion of the trial will take. To determine this counsel must prepare direct examination carefully and know how long each witness will be on the stand. At best counsel must estimate how long cross examination will take.
For multiple day trials the estimation of how long witnesses will take on the stand becomes even more critical because witnesses must be scheduled. The best way to irritate a judge or a jury is to announce mid-day that you have run out of witnesses and ask for a recess until the next day.
Know Who You Will be Working With
If counsel has not tried a case with a particular attorney on the other side before they should speak to others who know that attorney to get an idea of the attorney's style in the courtroom. Halfway through opening statement is not a good time to start learning about your adversary's style.
Even more important counsel must know the preferences of the judge. If counsel has not appeared before a particular judge for trial before it is important to speak to attorneys who have to learn the judge's preferences and quirks. It is also wise to speak to the judge's judicial assistant in advance, the one who sits in court with the judge. The judicial assistant can provide very valuable information about what the judge prefers.
An experienced trial judge can tell in two minutes if counsel has prepared for trial in advance or if they first looked at their file the morning of trial. It is painfully obvious. Though juries may not be as astute they quickly learn which attorney in the courtroom has prepared and which has not. You do not want to be the one they decide has not prepared.
The better you prepare for trial and the more organized you appear the better impression you will make on both judges and juries and the more effective you will be in presenting evidence and argument. To be an effective litigator you must inspire confidence and trust. A lack of organization does not inspire confidence or trust. Spend the time you need to prepare well. It pays off greatly in many ways.